A NEOCLASSICAL CLEOPATRA
by Joan K. Yanni
The painting came on the
European market at a time when the Gallery was interested in finding a 17th-century
Neoclassical work to fill a void in its collection. Clearly this was a history
painting, and a Neoclassical one at that. Its vivid colors, dramatic subject,
and attention to detail attested to that fact. But virtually nothing was
known about the painting other than the artist’s name, written in small letters
at the bottom right of the painting: BDuvivier 1789. What was its
story?
A Neoclassical Cleopatra |
Examine the clues. The
dominant men are soldiers—Romans, judging from their costumes. And the man in
the foreground, with the elaborate helmet and sandals, is their leader. The man
lying on the gilt bed is dying or dead—his grayish skin and the wound under his
breast, without blood, suggests dead.
Now look at the expressive
hands in the painting. The hand of the woman at the center of the picture gets
our attention immediately. She is in distress; her fingers are spread out
as though to ward off a blow or plead for help. The women in the background are
covering their faces with their hands and fearfully slinking into the shadows;
the man on the right, startled, has just knocked over a pitcher. These people
look like servants. The hands of the Romans are strong, purposeful. One carries
a sword; the other holds the woman’s arm. Look more closely and you will see a
dagger in her hand. (Donald Rosenthal in his article in Porticus tells
us that the artist was focused on the hands. Infra red photographs show that
the central woman’s left forearm was moved from “an extended to an upright
position to create greater central dramatic focus,” and the dying man’s “left
arm and hand were moved to produce a more expressive pose.”)
Now examine the large basin on
the floor near the body. Made of silver, it is decorated with gold Egyptian
ibis figures. What historical events involved both Rome and Egypt ? Was the man on the right washing
the body? And who is the woman? Is that a jeweled diadem or small
crown on her head? It is, and she is Cleopatra, queen of Egypt . The man
is Mark Antony, who went to Egypt
to conquer, but fell in love with Cleopatra, married her, and deserted Rome . The Romans under
Octavian Caesar have come to reclaim Egypt .
The happenings in the painting
are not easy to identify because they are rarely pictured. Cleopatra has often
been shown holding the dying Antony
in her arms, but Cleopatra’s capture by the Romans is rarely the subject of a
painting. The incident is described by the Greek historian Plutarch in
his Life of Mark Antony. As he tells it, after being defeated by
Octavian in the battle of Actium in 31 BCE, Antony and Cleopatra fled
back to Egypt
where Cleopatra locked herself in her “monument,” a fortified tomb. Antony , falsely told that
Cleopatra had committed suicide, stabbed himself. He was brought to Cleopatra
by his soldiers, and then died in her arms. As the Romans broke into the
monument, Cleopatra attempted to stab herself, but the Roman Proculeius stopped
her. And this is the moment pictured in our painting.
As is well known, Cleopatra
did manage to commit suicide, legend says through the bite of a poisonous asp
(brought to her
by her servant in a basket of
lunch?) The painting is fascinating, and tour groups, who have seen Romans on
television or in the movies, enjoy playing detective, just as the curators at
the Gallery did. Once the characters had been identified, the painting was
named Cleopatra Captured by Roman Soldiers after the
Death of Mark Amthony (84.40)
Johannes Berdardus Duvivier,
called Bernard Duvivier, (1762-1837) was born in Bruges (Flanders ).
He first studied at the Academy in Bruges ,
where he painted genre scenes, seascapes, and allegorical themes. He went next
to Paris ,
studying at the Paris
Academy with
Joseph-Benoit Suvée, whose archaeological settings and dramatic scenes were a
marked influence on the younger painter, as were the works of Jacques Louis
David.. In 1785 Duvivier received second prize in the Prix de
Rome competition for The Death of Camilla, a historical composition
that showed the artist’s great promise.
Though Duvivier won a series
of prizes, he attempted to win the Grand Prix three times, but was not
successful. His works had captured the eye of a benefactor, however, who funded
three years of study in Rome ,
beginning in 1789, the year the Cleopatra was painted and the beginning
of the French Revolution. He remained there until 1793, then set out on a trip
to Florence , Bologna , Venice and Milan with three friends. He returned
to Paris in
1796, when the Revolution had become less threatening, and became a French citizen.
Duvivier exhibited at the
Paris Salon from 1793 to 1827, and showed drawings after famous works by
Raphael, Correggio and Leonardo. He soon returned to painting, concentrating on
a small picture based on Homer, Hector Mourned by the Trojans and His Family.
A Danish critic praised the draftsmanship, expression, and color of the
work, and noted that that the small painting (24x31 inches) contained forty–six
well executed figures.
In his later career, Duvivier
moved away from the time-consuming smaller pictures and exhibited larger
historical and mythological works as well as a few landscapes and portraits.
His reputation as a history painter, however, is confirmed by the numerous
engravings and lithographs after his compositions, a few of which may have been
made by the painter himself.
His career after 1800 is
difficult to follow. Auction catalogues and other publications of the period
list dozens of paintings and drawings, but most cannot be traced. By the last
year of his life he seems to have spent most of his time painting religious and
mythological subjects, which were copied for publication by a variety of
engravers and litho-graphers. He was appointed a professor at the École
Normale in Paris
in 1832 and died in Paris
in November of 1837.
Source: Curatorial files,
Donald Rosenthal, “A Cleopatra by Bernard Duvivier,” Porticus 8 (1985),
Susan Dodge Peters, editor, Memorial
Art Gallery ,
Introduction to the Collection.
See Grant Holcomb (2001) Voices in the Gallery: Writers on Art.
ReplyDelete