COLONIAL AMERICAN SILVER IN
MAG’S SILVER CASE
By Susan R. Gordon
How many times have you walked by MAG’s silver case on the
way into the American collection without considering the objects housed there,
their importance to early Colonial American life, or their connection to our
John Singleton Copley portrait of one of the silversmiths, Nathaniel Hurd?
The development of Colonial American silversmithing mirrors
the social development of our nation.
The first silver pieces were of simple design and purely utilitarian in
function. As our population and
prosperity increased, so, too, did the need and desire for greater output with
more refinement in design. By the time
of the Revolutionary War, wealthy colonists had attained a standard of living
equal to their British counterparts.
After the war, the quality being produced by American silversmiths
reached a pinnacle and remained there into the first quarter of the 19th
century.
When the first settlers came to Virginia and New
England , most arrived with just the basic necessities. The ships
which crossed the Atlantic provided little
space for luxuries. Some of the more prosperous travelers did bring some of
their treasures along, and these treasures without doubt included silver. Since ancient times, mankind has used
precious metals, melted and refined as coinage, as a means of exchange.
The earliest silver brought to our shores was of English and
Dutch origin. As trade developed with the West Indies ,
Spain
and Portugal ,
this coinage was added to the coffers of a growing wealthy merchant class in
the Colonies. This silver was eventually melted down by Colonial silversmiths
to form the pieces we recognize as American.
Following the English and European traditions, a potential Colonial
silversmith had to endure a seven-year apprenticeship to a master craftsman,
from age fourteen until twenty-one. If the young man passed the skill test, he
would then become a master. It is likely that Nathaniel Hurd was apprenticed to
his father, master silversmith Jacob, to achieve his master status.
Because religion played an important role in the lives of
New England Colonists (remember the Pilgrims!) the first silver items created
were for churches and of simple design. Regional designs followed the ancestry
of the population--after all, the earliest New England
and Philadelphia
silversmiths were British, while New
York was settled by the Dutch. Thus, silver designs
from New England and Philadelphia were simple, while New York designs were
more ornate.
Not until 1652 did the Colonies have their own currency.
John Hull, a London
silversmith, was made mintmaster by the General Court of Massachusetts. With
his partner, Robert
Sanderson, he designed the willow tree, oak tree and pine
tree
Shillings, which were the currency used in New
England until 1683. Hull
was most likely the first silversmith to work in Boston .
Even though these shillings were meant for exchange only in New England , the engines of trade made these coins travel
further then intended from home base. Since silver had value, it was worth
stealing, a cause for concern for a wealthy merchant with a stash of money at
home or at his business--a problem, indeed!
The solution: to protect his investments the merchant took
has coins to a silversmith, who melted the silver down, turning it into
household items--spoons, tankards, and porringers. The silversmith, through his
role as safekeeper, became a trusted and valuable member of society. In
essence, he was a banker with artistically skilled hands.
The process of turning coinage into objects involved melting
the coins, refining the silver, pouring it into a skillet, and cooling it into
a flat block. The block was then hammered out into a thickness appropriate to
producing the desired object.
In order to strengthen the metal and to prevent brittleness,
the silversmith used a process known as annealing. The metal was worked while cold and was
repeatedly heated over charcoal. The final step included polishing the object
by rubbing with pumice, then with a burnisher. In this way the surface was
rubbed smooth, still leaving some hammer marks.
The merchant further protected his investment by having his
silver items engraved with his crest or initials, making them easier to trace in
case some enterprising thief whisked them away from their owner!
MAG’s silver collection includes a teapot, ca 1740, by
Jacob Hurd (1702-1758); spoons, ca 1760,
by Nathaniel Hurd (1730-1777); and a porringer, ca 1730, by John Burt
(1692-1746).
The next time you pass by the case containing these
treasures, notice the hammer marks on the porringer and take a moment to
consider the connection between the spoons, Nathaniel Hurd and our Copley unfinished
portrait of him.
But that’s a subject for a future discussion.
Sources: Old and Sold Antiques Auction/Antiques Digest--Lost Knowledge from the
Past. “Silver of the Colonies”
Society of American Silversmiths, Summer 1999
Newsletter, by Marjorie B. Searl
About silver: from the Harvard University Gazette, October
11, 2001: Several silver items came into
Harvard’s collection as additional tuition payment granting well-connected
students elevated status or exempting them from chores. The Browne Cup, a
ceremonial two-handed cup dated circa 1731, was commissioned by Harvard
following a bequest by Col. Samuel Brown of Salem , a wealthy merchant. Brown donated 60
pounds for a silver piece to be engraved with his family’s coat of arms.
According to Corporation records, Brown’s previous donation had freed his son
Samuel from responsibility for errands and chores.
No comments:
Post a Comment